Portrait commission
-
@QuietYell Absolutely correct. It is observational drawing, which is good for practice and makes you better at imaginative drawing, but is not as challenging or exciting as imaginative stuff.
-
@smceccarelli - completely agree - definitely not an actual oil painting. I too have seen other artists who embellish over a print on canvas with traditional paint to give depth and texture etc. So like a hybrid of the two.
I do not do these portrait type pieces or commissions anymore as I did not enjoy them and I was not charging enough for the time and materials involved - I have learned my lessons there.
But like you point out - having a printer with inks you can draw/paint/glaze over is really great and the possibilities become endless really.
Do you watch any of Jake Parker's videos - you may have noticed in some of his recent ones (and his facebook live videos etc). He will print out his sketch and then ink/color over the top of that. Here is a link to one his most recent ones - if you go to the 5 minute mark he talks about it a little bit: https://www.facebook.com/jakeparkerart/videos/1208379585879492/
-
@Rich-Green Thank you so much for such great info!
-
@Rich-Green Oh yes - it was a real eye-opener. I have been experimenting with that process (for example for the last third Thursday) and I like it a lot.
I am fascinated by mixing digital and traditional workflows. I had dabbed a bit into mixing pastel and digital when I was at school, and have been following other artists that mix digital and traditional. Justin Gerard has an awesome watercolor/digital hybrid process, where he does the value study in watercolor (on a digital sketch, printed on watercolor paper), then colors with transparent layers in Photoshop. He gets these very vibrant pieces, with the depth of digital painting but the texture of watercolors - and has the watercolor study as original art. I also like the look of traditional inks and pencils more than digital line - and I am thinking about experimenting with line-dominated styles....
Pity there is only one life.... -
Great thread, lots of interesting comments and beautiful portrait too!
@Rich-Green Thanks for sharing your art canvas method, very interesting to see! One day (when I have more space) I'd like a printer that can print on a wider variety of surfaces. I'm not surprised that you stopped doing those though, I can imagine that with all the printer set-up time, varnishing etc plus cost of materials and your time, it must be difficult to get enough money back to make it worthwhile.
@smceccarelli Oh I am fascinated with traditional/digital hybrids too...I'm pretty sure that's the way I'll end up working, I'm just not sure how yet....and I keep on experimenting to try and find out. I love the way traditional methods look, with the ink on paper and the textures...yet there is also so much to admire in digital pieces, with the sharpness and contrast, all the amazing brushes and the various layering techniques that you just can't do traditionally.
That's really interesting to hear about Justin Gerard's process, just been to his website, amazing work. I recently experimented doing my value layer in dark tones of watercolour, then scanning in to do digital colour on top...didn't quite work out the way I wanted, but it was good to try.
-
Maybe I'm missing something, but in my head, digital is just another medium. I believe that whether the portrait is drawn/painted digitally or traditionally does not matter that much - what you pay for is the artists interpretation of the face. If the artist can capture the expression, create a suitable mood and feel to the portrait - I think this is more important than how it was created. I find portraits fascinating, and would really like to get better at them.
-
@Camomilla Sure, digital is only another medium, you are right. But digital does not produce an original, whereas traditional does. A portrait client buys an original - he is not interested in prints generally. Also, you cannot really sell any rights to a portrait, unless is of a famous person for some editorial use - so you really only sell the original.
-
@smceccarelli Perhaps selling as a limited print-run of one could compensate for the lack of an original (haha)
No, in all honesty, who would buy the print of a portrait of someone else (or someone elses relative) - it's probably only interesting for the commissioner anyway 
I've given this some thought - I can't really work much traditionally as it triggers inflammation in arms/elbows/shoulders/upper back. This has been an issue for years, and will probably always be an issue as long as I continue to work full time as a graphic designer. My spare time activities has to be less of a burden on these areas, unfortunately I mainly like to do stuff that are tough on the arms. Like knitting, crochet, drawing and such
I find that digital drawing allows me more drawing time, due to less friction between surface and stylus - not to mention the fact that the undo-feature makes my drawings looser and not inhibited by the fear of making mistakes. I still sketch a little traditionally from time to time, but try to limit it. -
Looks good
-
Finished - it was actually more interesting than I thought. It was fun to get back to pastel after so much time. A bit of a struggle, but I guess you never forget.
Meanwhile, I have put that awesome printer on my wish list
-
Beautiful work:)
-
Really lovely - technically so proficient but also lets their personality shine. I'm sure the family will be very happy with the commission!
-
@smceccarelli These are beautiful, really nice work!
-
Loverleee!
-
I don't know what your subjects look like, but these are very natural looking and full of life. Well done!
