@jazeps-tenis ooh, youâre hitting awfully close to the whole âfine art vs illustrationâ tension with your points. Which isnât to say that they are not good points, but since you brought it up I think we might as well go a bit deeper. đ
On the one hand, you have the fine artist. This artist has a message, or just a desire to create, and makes their art the way they want because they are an artist. And maybe someone likes it and pays for it after the fact, but the important thing is that the artist was true to their art.
Then you have your commercial illustrator. They have skills for sale. People in need of those skills offer money to get the images they want. The illustrator may or may not enjoy what theyâre creating, but the important thing is that theyâre being paid.
And then there is the whole range of in-between and exceptions, so you can think of it as a spectrum if you like. So maybe for someone who is closer to the Fine Art side would be less concerned about critique. Theyâre in it for the art and the act of creation, receiving approval in the form of money (or any other form for that matter) is secondary. Those aiming more toward the commercial illustration side, however, need that critique, because approval, specifically in the form of money (eventually, hopefully đ) is part of what they are âin itâ for.
Being more toward one side or the other isnât inherently good or bad. Itâs just a different reason for developing a similar skill set. These classes/forums tend to appeal more to people aiming to become commercial illustrators, thus the general support of critiques.
Which isnt to say that there isnât, unfortunately, some tension now and then between the two sides, but that is a whole ânuther debate that I'm not ready to get into.
đ